Court Related Materials
<b>Court Orders:</b>
* Order granting MAP’s request to <A HREF =”http://www.mediaaccess.org/3rdCircStay.pdf”>stay the FCC’s order</a>. <i>(9/3/03)</i>* Order granting MAP’s request to <a HREF =”http://www.mediaaccess.org/TransferOrder.pdf”> deny the networks motion,</a> keep the case in Philadelphia. <i>(9/15/03)</i>* <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/Order100103.pdf”> Order denying</a> industry’s second request to transfer the case. <i>(10/01/03)</i>* Court issues <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/OralArgumentTime.pdf”>Oral Argument Order</a> <i>(1/08/04)</i></li>* The Court directs counsel to <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/Order1-27-04.pdf”>file letter briefs commenting</a> on the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, H.R. 2673, 108th Cong. § 629 (2004), which sets the national television audience reach limitation at 39 percent, and provides for quadrennial review of other ownership rules. <i>(01/27/04)</i>
<b>Oral Argument</b></u> <i>(02/11/04)</i>
* Court issues <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/OralArgumentTime.pdf”>Oral Argument Order</a> <i>(1/08/04)</i>* Time allocation for <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/ProRegOralArgument.pdf”>Anti-Deregulatory Peititioners</a>* Time allocation for <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/MMTCOralArgStatement.pdf”>MMTC</a>* Time allocation for <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/TimeAllocationforDeregulatoryPetitioners.pdf”>Deregulatory Petitioners</a>* Time allocation for <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/FCCOralArgumentTimeAllotment.pdf”>Respondents</a></li></ul>
<b>Information on parties participating in oral arguments:</b>* <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/OralArgumentChart1.pdf”>Party information</a> if the Court decides to include arguments about the national TV ownership cap.* <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/OralArgumentChart2.pdf”>Party information</a> if the Court decides not to include arguments about the national TV ownership cap.
<b>Letters addressing impact of Congressional adoption of national television ownership limit on the Prometheus case:</b>* <a HREF=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/Order1-27-04.pdf”>Court Order</a> requesting letter briefs <i>(01/27/04)</i>
bq. <b>Anti-Deregulatory Petitioners:</b>* <a href=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/CitizenPet28JLetter.pdf”>Citizen Petitioners’</a> <i>(01/26/04)</i>* <a href=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/CapitalLetterBrief.pdf”>Capital Broadcasting Corp.</a> <i>(02/02/04)</i>* <a href=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/NASALetterBrief.pdf”>NASA</a> <i>(01/31/04)</i>
bq. <b>Deregulatory Petitioners:</b>* <a href=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/NetworksLetterBrief.pdf”>Networks</a> <i>(02/02/04)</i>* <a href=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/PaxsonUnivisionLetterBrief.pdf”>Paxson/Univision</a> <i>(02/02/04)</i>* <a href=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/TribuneLetterBrief.pdf”>Tribune Company</a> <i>(01/30/04)</i>
bq. <b>Respondent:</b>* <a href=”http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/diversity/FCCLetterBrief.pdf”>FCC</a> <i>(01/30/04)</i>


