Overview
Media, particularly broadcast media, presents a significant opportunity to educate this country’s citizens about important issues of the day. Broadcasters are obligated under the law to do so, and other opportunities exist to create new paradigms. While the government has an important role to promote such speech, it should not suppress the wide range of free expression in the media.
Media Access Project works to ensure that broadcasters and cable operators advance the democratic process. There are many aspects of this fight that have captured national attention, such as proposals for free airtime for political candidates, sponsorship identification, or the debate over the funding of public TV. Other aspects may be less well-known, but are no less important.
The Public’s First Amendment Right to Hear was established in Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
“[T]he people as a whole retain their interest in free speech by radio and their collective right to have the medium function consistently with the ends and purposes of the First Amendment.
It is the right of the viewers and listeners … which is paramount.”
— Justice Byron White, writing the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission.
This case has been reaffirmed by the Supreme Court on several occasions, most recently in the summer of 1994.
In this landmark case, the Court found that the First Amendment includes a right of the people to receive information, in addition to the better-known right of speakers to speak. The most common formulation of this right, called “diversity,” is the notion that people should be free to choose among many sources of information, viewpoints, and ideas.
Another important application of this right to receive information is the requirement that broadcasters program in a way that serves the “public interest.” This is why many stations have public service announcements, produce public affairs shows, or carry political debates.